|
| Thoughts on Mixed Use in Region 5 |
|
|
|
| 4x4Voice - The General's (aka Don Amador) Recreation HQ | |
| Written by Don Amador | |
| Tuesday, 20 January 2009 11:50 | |
|
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 From The General's BLOG - Thoughts on Mixed Use in Region 5 In response to a Jan. 13, 2009 “mixed-use” memo from Region 5, first let me state that I believe Region 5 has created an number of unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles when it comes to the designation of level 3 roads as mixed-use where that road is open for use by both street legal and non-street legal OHVs. I have shared those views with R5 on a number of occasions and in comment letters on travel management planning efforts. It has been my experience that there is little – if any on some Forests – accident history on level 3 roads between OHVs and passenger vehicles. If there were accidents they were most likely OHV vs. OHV rather then OHV vs. a passenger car.If there is a silver lining in that memo - it is the direction for encouraging Forests to reclassify a level 3 road to a level 2 road. I think that is a plan of action that OHVers could and should support. The only other viable approach – and one that I hope R5 will support - would be to construct parallel (companion trails) or alternative trails that lead to the same destination or complete a loop opportunity. Many of those trails could be constructed basically in the road prism where there should be less environmental concerns or obstacles. Read more on The General's Blog - Thoughts on Mixed Use
|
|
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 July 2009 14:30 |