Re: OT:Mileage/was TOY: Car and Driver: Ford Explorers
|
|
| http://www.4x4wire.com/lists/toyota/200012/msg00072.html
|
Short Cuts |
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: OT:Mileage/was TOY: Car and Driver: Ford Explorers
Brien.Blankenship@radisys.com writes:
> Having had both the gas and deisel ( on my 3rd pwr stroke ) engines in
> these pigs I can't figure out why anyone would go with a gas motor. Even my
> step dads f450 super duty gets about 11 mpg pulling his 37' fifth wheel.
> Not just that but the maintenance is far easier and the torque is
> incredible. I would say anyone looking at these trucks owes it to
> themselves to drive both before making a decision. Deisel is everywhere.
Here we go again ;-)
Run the numbers and see why some of us choose gas over deisel.
How about $3-4k higher purchase cost? How about (right now, where I live)
$.30 HIGHER deisel costs over regular gas? How about the deisel truck is fas
noisier and vibrates more at interstate speeds? (where I drive, a LOT)
I broke it down for my uses, and at under 20,000 miles per year, and roughly
$3000 higher purchase price, and even figuring gas costing $.10 MORE than
deisel (which it does not here) it would have taken me 7 YEARS to break even
on the cost in fuel mileage savings with the deisel compared to the gas.
Like I said - sit down and do the math for your uses and deisel is NOT always
the best answer...
BTW, you say drive both - have you spent much time beind the V10, or are you
comparing new deisels to old style gas engines? Just wondering...
David
DRM033@aol.com
http://www.4x4spot.com