RE: JPOR: winter ponderings
|
|
| http://www.4x4wire.com/lists/jeepoffroad/200011/msg00013.html
|
Short Cuts |
|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: JPOR: winter ponderings
And you would have the dually brakes sticking out inboard quite a bit to
rest on unsuspecting rocks out there unfortunately. The wheels would have
to be wide then?
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul W. [mailto:a4xnut@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:02 AM
To: jeepoffroad@4x4wire.com
Subject: RE: JPOR: winter ponderings
****************Please Remember to snip your
replies***************
"BRERETON, John" <John_BRERETON@Montellna.com> wrote:
> Intriguing. Was it only '77 F350 duallies that would have
a rear the same
> width as a YJ? Too bad it is wider than a CJ.
Keep in mind that unless you run dually-style wheels, even
though the
flange-to-flange distance is the same, the wheels you have
to use with an 8-lug
axle will make your track width a lot wider... consider the
stock YJ rim has
~5.25" backspacing (OEM 7" rim) and an average 8-lug rim is
~3" - so track
width just increased 4.5"! OTOH, if you ran dually wheels
as a single, front
style the track width would be less than stock. (not sure
what the backspacing
is on a dually rim, but it is as much as the width - maybe
more)
Paul
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your
answer.
http://experts.yahoo.com/
*******************************************************************
Link to Archive, Mission Statement, Rules, Subscribe
and
Unsubscribe instructions are available at:
http://www.pclink.com/jnutter/JPOR.htm