4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums Index

4x4Wire | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
Galleries | Offtopic Chat | Garage Sale | Items Wanted | Vendors | Trailrides and Events | Recreational Access and Landuse


4x4Wire TrailTalk Jeep Forums

More Jeep on 4x4Wire: 4x4Wire Jeep Section | 4x4Wire Jeep Tech Section
4x4Wire TrailTalk Jeep Forums: Jeep Talk | Jeep Tech


Jeep Forums >> Jeep Tech

sindersblue
Mudrunner


Reged: 05/22/05
Posts: 475
Loc: SW Pa
Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear
      11/13/05 10:37 PM

Quote:

Broncos and F150s are rotting in wrecking yards and long since been crushed and made into Toyotas, all the while Jeeps and dana axles have been built and rebuilt and are still working just fine.




Broncos aside, F150s are TRUCKS. People bought these things for work, hauling, and other tasks that kill vehicles. Yes, there are a lot of them in the bone yard but thats because of the shear numbers in witch they were built. Not to mention that there are still thousands of these vehicles still on the road so there is still a high demand for the good parts on these trucks. To be fair, there are hoards of Jeeps in the yards due to the volume of witch they were built and the demand for thier parts due to the thousands still on the road.

On the Broncos, the 1st gen(66-77) parts are highly sought after;
Jeepers; (axles, near Jeep width D44 front, 9" rear and manual trannys,(T18)
Racers; (rear 9")
1st gen Bronco lovers; everything else.
Only Jeepers, largely, are the only ones looking for jeep parts.
The 2nd gen Broncos(78-79 and F150s are sought after for thier axles,( HP D44 fronts 9" rear)manual transmisons(T18, NP435)/T cases(NP205) by a lot of wheelers no mater what they drive.
The 3rd gen broncos....these are junk and belong in the yard.

Quote:

Jeeps and dana axles have been built and rebuilt and are still working just fine.




SD, Jeeps are built and rebuilt because they are cool and capable in a way no other vehicle is, witch is why you you don't see many "universal" type jeeps in the bone yard. When you do see them they are striped clean in a mater of days adding to this testament.
Dana axles(not all) are built and rebuilt cause there' well desiged. (for the most part) But lets face it, there aren't a lot of strong Jeep width alternatives that aren't custom axles out there, instantly making Jeep Danas a good reliable axle.

Again on the 9", the sky is the limit on where one could go w/it. Yes, the pinion stem is smaller, but you can upgrade to a larger pinion stem and larger pinion support/bearings if you are woried about strength. Is the 9" for everyone?
NO. Is it a viable choice for an upgrade in a well thought out application? YES.

--------------------
"If you can't learn to do something well, learn to enjoy doing it poorly".

85 22RE, 5spd 4Runner project
87 Turbo Truck, Boost Controller, otherwise stock... for now.
86 Turbo 4Runner, Project

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous 11/08/05 10:56 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Mudlover27   11/09/05 11:01 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/09/05 11:41 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Dan-H   11/09/05 11:55 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear sindersblue   11/09/05 07:40 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/10/05 09:40 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear strawmyers   11/10/05 12:45 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous   11/12/05 06:34 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear tomriddle   11/12/05 08:12 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/12/05 08:57 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous   11/13/05 02:05 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/13/05 04:31 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear sindersblue   11/13/05 10:37 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous   11/14/05 09:07 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear sindersblue   11/14/05 11:07 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Dan-H   11/15/05 12:23 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/16/05 12:07 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous   11/20/05 12:46 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear superdawg   11/20/05 01:26 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Anonymous   11/21/05 06:43 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear 80CJ   11/16/05 04:28 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear Dan-H   11/14/05 02:48 PM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear sindersblue   11/10/05 10:52 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear tomriddle   11/09/05 08:49 AM
. * * Re: 9" rear vs Dana 44 rear kc77cj7   11/09/05 08:11 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  KF6ZPL 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 1298

Rate this thread

Jump to



4x4Wire.com | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
About 4x4Wire | Advertiser's Guide |
This site and all original materials contained herein are Copyright 1999 - 2013 by OutdoorWire, Inc. -- All Rights Reserved.
The use of this website, OutdoorWire, or any of its publications or services is subject to the terms of use agreement.
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
This publication and OutdoorWire, Inc. assume no liability for your use of the material contained within this site.
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, SUVWire, JeepWire, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc.


Contact 4x4Wire | Privacy statement 4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Generated in 0.019 seconds in which 0.006 seconds were spent on a total of 11 queries. Zlib compression enabled.