4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums Index

4x4Wire | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
Galleries | Offtopic Chat | Garage Sale | Items Wanted | Vendors | Trailrides and Events | Recreational Access and Landuse



Isuzu TrailTalk Forums
More Isuzu on 4x4Wire: 4x4Wire Isuzu Section | 4x4Wire Isuzu Tech
Isuzu Forums: Isuzu 4x4 and SUV Talk | Isuzu 4x4 and SUV Tech | Isuzu Diesel


Isuzu Forums >> Isuzu 4x4 & SUV Talk

Pages: 1
TrooperMagnum
Wheeler


Reged: 09/06/01
Posts: 199
Loc: Portland, OR.
Why unequal length a-arms?
      #640120 - 12/10/04 05:56 PM

Why do auto makers design the a-arms with a shorter arm on the top?

Karl

--------------------
Why?....Because they dared me to!!!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: TrooperMagnum]
      #640122 - 12/10/04 06:04 PM

well i know with the race cars i work with that have excess of 24in of wheel travel the equal length will cause bumpsteer through the full cycle of the suspension with un equal length the bumpsteer is very minimal so that is why the manufaturs use them less problems down the road equal length do work just alot of work with the spindles lots and lots of geometry sharpen that pencil

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
OffRodEO
Rock Warrior


Reged: 09/23/03
Posts: 893
Loc: taylorsville, utah
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: TrooperMagnum]
      #640126 - 12/10/04 06:09 PM

hmmm thats a good question...

1. metal, if they saved 2 lbs on each arm, 4lbs for each car, multiply by 100,000 cars thats 400,000 lbs of metal saved.

2. in my eyes the upper arm just keeps the spindle straight and the lower arm takes all the punishment,

3. the lower arm has the torsion bar connected to it.

4. upper sits on the side of the frame rail, lower sits under it

the exact reason why it is shorter is unknown to me, i dont know what exact benefit that apply's. To me it seems right to make it longer, i dont know why, it just looks and sounds better to make it longer and stronger.

kevan

i know most of my answers are going to be quoted

--------------------
93 rodeo,3.2 manual, limo tint, nice sound system,keyless entry and a killer alarm, drop in K&N, 3 inch DOR lift, 32-11.50 BFG MT's, warn hubs zutah.com wheeler
WELLS FARGO BANK WILL RIP YOU OFF!GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TrooperMagnum
Wheeler


Reged: 09/06/01
Posts: 199
Loc: Portland, OR.
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: OffRodEO]
      #640130 - 12/10/04 06:18 PM

OK...Let me clearify the question so as to narrow down the responses.

I'm thinking purely from a geometry standpoint.

The shorter arm will have a smaller arch, thus pulling the top of the tire "in" as the arms become unparallel. Why do the designers want this to happen?

KM

--------------------
Why?....Because they dared me to!!!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pplotz
Rock Warrior


Reged: 01/21/04
Posts: 906
Loc: Denver, CO
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: TrooperMagnum]
      #640151 - 12/10/04 06:59 PM

ok, you need an engineering degree to answer this one, but I'll try to remember from what I was told (BTW, scott at rockstomper is really good at this too, he built his own control arms for his long travel IFS toyota).

you can get more :edit: equal (meaning less wear on the tires, keeping them flat) :/edit: travel out of unequal length control arms. see there you have it.

hehehe, I'm not qualified to say anything past that

Edited by pplotz (12/15/04 01:23 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hunterdan
Rock Warrior


Reged: 09/30/03
Posts: 826
Loc: Poconos, PA
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: TrooperMagnum]
      #640157 - 12/10/04 07:15 PM

Ok, i have a degree, well will have a degree in engineering, but its still not easy to describe. I drew up a quick picture on autocad to show what happens when the suspension cycles up and down. The picture didnt seeem to come out too well, but I will try to edit it later, but just for arguements sake, here it is.

Dan
And the picture didnt work...

--------------------
92 Rodeo, 3.1 TB crank, custom bumpstop spacers, DOR shackles, Flipped ball joints, D44 Rear, 4.56s and new magnaflow cat and dynomax ultraflow muffler Since been replaced by a 2 door Explorer on 31's shackles, cranked torsion bars and full exhaust

Edited by hunterdan (12/10/04 07:16 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WillV
Getting the Wheeling Fever


Reged: 12/02/04
Posts: 91
Loc: Leesburg VA
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: pplotz]
      #640158 - 12/10/04 07:16 PM

Here you go:

http://www.allpar.com/ed/suv-suspensions.html

"Unequal length control arm suspensions are the most complex of the designs considered, but also, potentially, the most "tunable" thanks to the isolation and adjustability of the various dynamic parameters, such as anti-dive, roll control, anti-squat, travel, etc. This very complexity entails analysis and determination of desired handling characteristics far more demanding, however. All of the manufacturers of Class 1/2/3/4/5 trucks have utilized this basic design over the years, but cost of the components has continued to be a justification stumbling block.

The term "unequal length" comes from the fact that, by design, the pivot length of the upper control arm (UCA) is shorter than the lower control arm (LCA). This is measured between the pivot axis and the ball joint, forming the triangle or "A" shape. Usually, the LCA is the longer of the 2 arms and travels through the lower measurement chord arc height. The UCA, being shorter, travels through a shorter chord arc height. (This means the chord arc height is measured horizontally.) The upper control arm moves the top of the tire a greater distance laterally in the vehicle than the lower control arm moves the GCP. This means, in a dynamic condition, the the tire wobbles at the top a lot more than the ground contact patch. This instability is what must be controlled by the geometry design to prevent a vehicle roll-over condition and directional instability."

--------------------
----
'96.5 Rodeo
DOR Shackles, 1.5" Tbar Crank, Superwinch Hubs, fancy rubber floormats.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BobDole
Mudrunner


Reged: 10/29/02
Posts: 320
Loc: Salt Lake City Ut
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: TrooperMagnum]
      #640159 - 12/10/04 07:20 PM

I'm sure a mod will chime in to clarify here, Ive seen this discussed in another post. Try the search, it might be buried though.

This is what I remember. Equal length A- arms will keep the camber consistent throughout the suspension cycle, but the problem is that the wheel moves out farther from the chassis as the arms get to be more level with the ground. So, under constant cycling the wheel gets pushed in, out, in, out. This wears tires down a whole lot.

Unequal length a-arms change camber throughout the cycle, but dont move in and out, for better handling and tread wear. They do all sorts of nasty calculus to get this to work, IIRC.

This is from what I read awhile ago. I may be screwing it all up, so HTH.

--------------------
97 Rodeo, Tint, Old Skool Stereo, Alarm, 3" DOR Lift (springz, spacers and shackelz) with 265/75/16 Destination MT's on steel, superwinch hubs, PIAA X-tra white headlights.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott F.
Mudrunner


Reged: 10/25/01
Posts: 498
Loc: stockton, california
Re: Why unequal length a-arms? [Re: BobDole]
      #640305 - 12/11/04 12:47 AM

The way I understand it, its for handling.

Two equal legnth A-arms create a paralleligram. This keeps the camber of the wheels constant. This gives you a flat foot print on the tire at all times. This is great for heavy travel suspensions (long travel) with vehicles that go in straight lines (dune buggies are a good example).

Unequal A-arms are able creat a camber efffect when turning right // or left \\. This gives better traction thru a turn and better handleing.

Well thats the way I understand it

Scott F.

--------------------
1995.5 Rodeo V6 Auto
Not enough money to put much here! I am taking donations


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 7 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  jezeric, Jim_Paget, houlster, mlclark, strawmyers 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 2566

Rate this topic

Jump to



4x4Wire.com | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
About 4x4Wire | Advertiser's Guide |
This site and all original materials contained herein are Copyright 1999 - 2013 by OutdoorWire, Inc. -- All Rights Reserved.
The use of this website, OutdoorWire, or any of its publications or services is subject to the terms of use agreement.
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
This publication and OutdoorWire, Inc. assume no liability for your use of the material contained within this site.
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, SUVWire, JeepWire, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc.


Contact 4x4Wire | Privacy statement 4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Generated in 0.016 seconds in which 0.005 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression enabled.