4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums Index

4x4Wire | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
Galleries | Offtopic Chat | Garage Sale | Items Wanted | Vendors | Trailrides and Events | Recreational Access and Landuse


4x4Wire Toyota Forums
More Toyota on 4x4Wire: 4x4Wire Toyota Section | Toyota FAQ | Toyota Tech
Toyota Forums: Early Toyota Trucks | 4Runner, FJ Crusier and SUV | T100 and Tundra | Tacoma | Toyota Archives



Toyota Forums >> Early Toyota Trucks

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
Anonymous
Unregistered




noisy 22re valves
      #32991 - 05/06/02 01:05 PM

How noisy should 22re valves be? I just adjusted mine to .20mm intake/.30mm exhaust and it is noisier than before. The PO had them adjusted to about.18 intake/.27 exhaust.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32992 - 05/06/02 03:17 PM

A little too loose is better than a little too tight. The noise lets you know that they are closing for sure.

If you followed FSM and rotated the engine only twice, setting 4 valves at a time, a few of them will be a tad off and can make extra noise. I have always done each cylined individually by setting each one at it's own TDC. This way you know that each valve is all the way closed and as loose as it can get. Then set to a "snug" 20/30 and your good to go.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carter
Body Damage is Cool


Reged: 06/22/00
Posts: 1002
Loc: The OC
Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32993 - 05/06/02 05:18 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Ranchero7:
How noisy should 22re valves be? I just adjusted mine to .20mm intake/.30mm exhaust and it is noisier than before. The PO had them adjusted to about.18 intake/.27 exhaust.

It is normal for them to be pretty loud. People will often adjust them too tight to quiet them up, but that can cause problems including missing at idle and burnt valves.

--------------------
Mike Carter
85 & 86 4Runners

My Website


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32994 - 05/07/02 08:49 AM

Thanks Pete and Mike. I'll leave 'em loose.
Steve


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brown
Rock Warrior


Reged: 02/22/02
Posts: 823
Loc: Auburn, GA
Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32995 - 05/07/02 11:30 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Chartdog:
If you followed FSM and rotated the engine only twice, setting 4 valves at a time, a few of them will be a tad off and can make extra noise. I have always done each cylined individually by setting each one at it's own TDC. This way you know that each valve is all the way closed and as loose as it can get. Then set to a "snug" 20/30 and your good to go.

[Confused] Could you explain that a little more? I don't understand how they could be a little off on the ones you adjust individually if the rocker arms are on the base circle of the cam. Maybe I'm missing something here, but I thought that was why the FSM procedure was the way it was-- so you could be on the base circle of the cam for those particular positions.

--------------------
Jeremy
SOLD:1988 Toyota 4x4 | 22RE | W56 | EB 270 cam


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32996 - 05/08/02 12:49 AM

Brown,

I'll try but I am not sure I get it myself.....

When I got my first Toyota truck (1984 22R) I had the same question that Ranchero7 had. A friend of mine at the time was a Toyota Dealer mechanic and he suggested the method of setting each valve individualy. The theory was that this way each valve would be all the way closed because it would be at the flatest part of the cam. Using the 4 at a time method several valves are not at that true zero point and could have a slight lift.

To be honest with you, this always sounded like BS to me too but, IT WORKED. I always got noticably quieter valves and was reasured that each one was set properly and was not too tight.

P.S. I think I bunged up the explanation the first time. I set each VALVE separatly, rotating the engine 8 times, and watching the cam lobe for the valve I am doing until it is clearly at the lowest part of the lobe.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carter
Body Damage is Cool


Reged: 06/22/00
Posts: 1002
Loc: The OC
Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32997 - 05/07/02 01:08 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Chartdog:
Brown,

I'll try but I am not sure I get it myself.....

When I got my first Toyota truck (1984 22R) I had the same question that Ranchero7 had. A friend of mine at the time was a Toyota Dealer mechanic and he suggested the method of setting each valve individualy. The theory was that this way each valve would be all the way closed because it would be at the flatest part of the cam. Using the 4 at a time method several valves are not at that true zero point and could have a slight lift.

To be honest with you, this always sounded like BS to me too but, IT WORKED. I always got noticably quieter valves and was reasured that each one was set properly and was not too tight.

P.S. I think I bunged up the explanation the first time. I set each VALVE separatly, rotating the engine 8 times, and watching the cam lobe for the valve I am doing until it is clearly at the lowest part of the lobe.

Doing it the FSM way, the rocker arms are loose on the four valves that are being adjusted. If the rocker arms are loose, the valves should be closed all the way.

--------------------
Mike Carter
85 & 86 4Runners

My Website


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32998 - 05/07/02 03:09 PM

It's my understanding that they must be adjusted with the motor as hot as possible. This requires quick work, but supposed to make a difference.

The following info is from a respected source on another Toyota forum:: The tune up tag under your hood says to do them hot at 8 and 12.

The underhood tag has metric specs of .200mm/.300mm and metric is the only system used in Japan.

But an American .008" feeler blade is not .200 mm thick it is .203 mm; i.e. thicker than .200

and an American .012" feeler blade is not .300 mm, it is .305 mm - again thicker.

So these thicker American feeler blades cause one to set the valve clearance wider than .200/.300. Worse yet, most people adjust valves with a warm engine instead of a hot engine. Valve clearances contract as the engine cools. Therefore this contracting effect causes mechanics to set the clearance looser still.

Setting to .007/.011 offsets the effect of the two sources of error mentioned above and engine power, engine noise and fuel economy is dramatically better at .007/.011
stiff sliding fit (hot engine) than at .008/.012 slight drag (warm engine)

[ 07 May 2002, 03:19 PM: Message edited by: Redtoy ]


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brown
Rock Warrior


Reged: 02/22/02
Posts: 823
Loc: Auburn, GA
Re: noisy 22re valves
      #32999 - 05/07/02 03:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Redtoy:
It's my understanding that they must be adjusted with the motor as warm as possible. This requires quick work, but supposed to make a difference.

Absolutely! I usually drive it for awhile, and then let it idle while I loosen up as many things as I can so I can rip everything off and get busy with the valves. It's a little hot at first, but not unbearable.

I've seen other posts talking about adjusting both intake and exhaust valves to .010", instead of .008" intake and .012" exhaust. Anyone actually do this? What are your results?

redtoy, I just read your updated post. I think the idea of doing .007" intake and .011" exhaust with the engine warm is a good idea. I may have to try that next time. I just don't want to burn a valve like carterman mentioned.

The issue with the metric vs. standard feeler blades shouldn't matter too much. 3 microns and 5 microns respectively is not very much at all. There could be much more than that variation alone from the manufacturing tolerances or temperature of the feeler blade. 5 microns (.005 mm)= .0002 inches [Nerd]

[ 07 May 2002, 03:38 PM: Message edited by: Brown ]

--------------------
Jeremy
SOLD:1988 Toyota 4x4 | 22RE | W56 | EB 270 cam


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carter
Body Damage is Cool


Reged: 06/22/00
Posts: 1002
Loc: The OC
Re: noisy 22re valves
      #33000 - 05/07/02 04:27 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Redtoy:
It's my understanding that they must be adjusted with the motor as hot as possible. This requires quick work, but supposed to make a difference.

The following info is from a respected source on another Toyota forum:: The tune up tag under your hood says to do them hot at 8 and 12.

The underhood tag has metric specs of .200mm/.300mm and metric is the only system used in Japan.

But an American .008" feeler blade is not .200 mm thick it is .203 mm; i.e. thicker than .200

and an American .012" feeler blade is not .300 mm, it is .305 mm - again thicker.

So these thicker American feeler blades cause one to set the valve clearance wider than .200/.300. Worse yet, most people adjust valves with a warm engine instead of a hot engine. Valve clearances contract as the engine cools. Therefore this contracting effect causes mechanics to set the clearance looser still.

Setting to .007/.011 offsets the effect of the two sources of error mentioned above and engine power, engine noise and fuel economy is dramatically better at .007/.011
stiff sliding fit (hot engine) than at .008/.012 slight drag (warm engine)

When I first did the valves on both my '87 and '86, they had been adjusted on the tight side by the P.O. Both had a miss at idle. I adjusted them to 8 & 12 but tight enough so I couldn't fit a 9 & 13 in without forcing it. Valves were noisier this way but it both trucks idled much smoother and seemed to run better overall. If you burn your hands doing the adjustment, you know it is hot enough [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] I guess it is better than my old corolla, you had to adjust the valves on that with the motor running!!! [Eek!]

--------------------
Mike Carter
85 & 86 4Runners

My Website


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  4Crawler, kewlynx 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 530

Rate this topic

Jump to



4x4Wire.com | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
About 4x4Wire | Advertiser's Guide |
This site and all original materials contained herein are Copyright 1999 - 2013 by OutdoorWire, Inc. -- All Rights Reserved.
The use of this website, OutdoorWire, or any of its publications or services is subject to the terms of use agreement.
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
This publication and OutdoorWire, Inc. assume no liability for your use of the material contained within this site.
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, SUVWire, JeepWire, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc.


Contact 4x4Wire | Privacy statement 4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Generated in 0.018 seconds in which 0.005 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression enabled.