4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums Index

4x4Wire | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
Galleries | Offtopic Chat | Garage Sale | Items Wanted | Vendors | Trailrides and Events | Recreational Access and Landuse


4x4Wire Mitsubishi Trail Talk Forums

More Mitsubishi on 4x4Wire: 4x4Wire Mitsubishi Section | Mitsubishi Tech
4x4Wire TrailTalk Mitsubishi Forums: Mitsubishi 4x4 and SUV Tech | Mitsubishi Diesels | Mitsubishi Archives


Mitsubishi Forums >> Mitsubishi 4x4 & SUV Tech

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | >> (show all)
87monty
Rock Warrior


Reged: 11/06/08
Posts: 539
Loc: Visalia CA, Central Valley
4G64 build (updated - was 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0)
      #1264694 - 05/24/12 07:46 PM

So I have been given a 91 LWB and was thinking of keeping the V6 just in case I had a major failure with my starion Turbo swap. Now the big question is what could I do to this 3.0 motor if I wanted to put it in? Is this motor pretty much the GT 3000 with 16 Valve heads? what about the 24 Valve heads? has anyone done this swap? I did find a guy that did a twin turbo set up on his and said he had gobbs of low end I guess.
As for the reason I pull a offroad trailer I built and im thinking it's around 1200Lbs unloaded. I have a good running rig now but sure notice it on the hills. I can put this on a stand and build it up from there, I know its not the 3.5 but it was free and runs good. Any imput would be great guys.

Edited by PHIL (11/06/12 08:01 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fasteddy
Web Wheeler


Reged: 01/30/01
Posts: 12703
Loc: Flat Creek, GA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: 87monty]
      #1264697 - 05/24/12 09:07 PM

I always wanted to build a gen1 3.0 with late model 3.5 sohc 24v heads in place of the 12v sohc heads, with a turbo. I would use a fabbed pside exh mani and use the stock dside down to the y pipe, then turn the dside exh up to the pside fabbed flange for about a 16g turbo. Should see around 300-325hp out of that setup if you intercool it well. Over 2x the 12v 3.0 hp of 150 or so, and over twice the torque, too. You would need to thermowrap the dside exh to keep the heat in to run all that way. It should drive like it had a husky v8 in it.

In terms of a 2.6t vs a 3.0na motor, the 2.6 wins. a 2.4dohcT wins by even more. 3.0 is about 150 hp and 175torque. A 2.6t is 206hp and about 225torque. I've seen dyno runs on a 2.4t at 314hp and 300ftlbs on pump gas.

--------------------
"If you can't be a good influence, don't worry, you can still be a horrid example."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
87monty
Rock Warrior


Reged: 11/06/08
Posts: 539
Loc: Visalia CA, Central Valley
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: fasteddy]
      #1264704 - 05/24/12 11:03 PM

I like the numbers of the V6 for sure, I think the extra 2 cylinders will help on up hill. I also think the turbo adition to the V6 will bring a nice power band threw out the hole torque curve. Dont get me wrong the 2.6 is an animal it self and has great power, but iv become more power hungry with my additions and like the sound of the V6.
My down side to the 2.6 is the balance shafts ( Which I do not have now) Seems unstable at higher Rpms. Im after a serious torgue monster and I think Eddys combo is what im after...
As always you come threw with the answers!

--------------------
1987 Montero= GPS,4speed auto,Starion turbo2.6, Maxxis 32/11.50.15 MT'S, Custom roof rack with lights,Super winch hubs,LSD in rear, Air shocks,2"Body lift,Custom 2.5 exhaust from Turbo Back.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rxinhed
The Mitsubishi Parts Guy


Reged: 02/21/05
Posts: 5896
Loc: Gerber, CA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: 87monty]
      #1264740 - 05/25/12 07:33 PM

Jason, may be time to graduate to the 5.0L option?

5L discussion



--------------------
1987 Raider (Roxy), 1988 Mighty Max turbo (Pearl), 1987 Ramcharger (Ryan), Sundry parts and parts cars


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
justice
Roll Me Over


Reged: 02/06/00
Posts: 3163
Loc: Coastal N Carolina, USA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: rxinhed]
      #1264743 - 05/25/12 09:07 PM

Cant put 24 Valve heads on a 12 Valve block there are minor differences with water jackets. Best bet to do this is get a wrecked Donor SR with 3.5 or maybe a later model 95-96 LS with the SOHC 24 valve if you want to stick with 3.0 displacement. You'll need to get the brain and wiring harness from donor...

--------------------
99 Gen 2.5, fixing, awaiting build
89 SWB- 33's, ARB Front locker, SR rear locker/axle, SR F brakes, winch, WST Offroad Armor all Around, 2.85 Aussie T-case Gears
Sold: (2) 95 SR's, 86 SWB, 90LWB, 91 LWB
-Can Change a timing belt in my sleep..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
87monty
Rock Warrior


Reged: 11/06/08
Posts: 539
Loc: Visalia CA, Central Valley
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: justice]
      #1264747 - 05/25/12 11:15 PM

Man so my options..ok heres a different approach has anyone thought of a 4G63 2.0 with a 2.4 crank which makes a 2.3 stroker? Im not sure at this point but can have a 2.0 wide block tomorrow if I want it. I have read that there bullet proof and have lots low end. Then there is the DOHC I want as well...Crap lol! V6 sounds good but then I see this 4 banger just smoke all outputs across the board.



--------------------
1987 Montero= GPS,4speed auto,Starion turbo2.6, Maxxis 32/11.50.15 MT'S, Custom roof rack with lights,Super winch hubs,LSD in rear, Air shocks,2"Body lift,Custom 2.5 exhaust from Turbo Back.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fasteddy
Web Wheeler


Reged: 01/30/01
Posts: 12703
Loc: Flat Creek, GA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: 87monty]
      #1264782 - 05/26/12 08:48 PM

Find a 4g64 wideblock and put the 4g63 heads on it and you have 6 more c.i., better torque, and should be able to make an easy 300hp with the right turbo setup and MSpnp.

Then sell the 4g63 short block and recoup some bucks.

The dohc 4g4 should handle 15psi on pump gas with the nice combustion chambers and 4v heads. I hear the gen1 heads flow better, and it seems you need the 6bolt block for best results. There are some water circulation mods you need to clear the firewall.

See projectzerog.com for all the skinny

--------------------
"If you can't be a good influence, don't worry, you can still be a horrid example."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
87monty
Rock Warrior


Reged: 11/06/08
Posts: 539
Loc: Visalia CA, Central Valley
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: fasteddy]
      #1264855 - 05/28/12 12:26 PM

Quote:

Find a 4g64 wideblock and put the 4g63 heads on it and you have 6 more c.i., better torque, and should be able to make an easy 300hp with the right turbo setup and MSpnp.

Then sell the 4g63 short block and recoup some bucks.

The dohc 4g4 should handle 15psi on pump gas with the nice combustion chambers and 4v heads. I hear the gen1 heads flow better, and it seems you need the 6bolt block for best results. There are some water circulation mods you need to clear the firewall.

See projectzerog.com for all the skinny




OK so im going for it! I found a 91 4G64 block at mt local yard for 150, I have found the 4G63 complete head for 200$
I already have a nice header that I bought a year or so ago.
found a 14B turbo from a guy here in town so im after that as well. The guy with the Gen1 head has a full dsm 4G63 gen1 wire harness that im getting also. Now im trying to find which intake I should run as there is many options for diffrent setup's I have seen. Eddy what is the MSpnp mean? Map sensor or? These engines have alot of aftermarket parts
as well as tunner software...and the fun starts!

--------------------
1987 Montero= GPS,4speed auto,Starion turbo2.6, Maxxis 32/11.50.15 MT'S, Custom roof rack with lights,Super winch hubs,LSD in rear, Air shocks,2"Body lift,Custom 2.5 exhaust from Turbo Back.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MontyMcV
Trail Leader


Reged: 06/04/03
Posts: 7044
Loc: Cleve-burg OH USA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: 87monty]
      #1264858 - 05/28/12 01:27 PM

MS = Mega Squirt

--------------------
Big Truck 2: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 94k, stock for now
Big Truck 1: 95, MT, >Gone<
Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top
Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 29k miles!
FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DR1665
Mudrunner


Reged: 12/15/05
Posts: 393
Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA
Re: 4Cyl turbo Vs V6 3.0? [Re: MontyMcV]
      #1264877 - 05/28/12 10:22 PM

You'll run into a lot of commentary on the DSM boards about the 1G head having larger ports and being better for top end. It's physics by popular opinion.

A well-maintained 4G63T is good for 400whp+ on the stock internals with proper tuning. You can mix-n-match a lot of parts.

I'd just leave it stock for the time being if you go that route.

Curious to see how this plays out.

--------------------
Brian DR1665 | GBXM | Gearheads United.
89 Raider SWB [rock] | 91 Galant VR4 [roller]


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | >> (show all)



Extra information
6 registered and 25 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  LandRaider, PHIL, off-roader 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6605

Rate this topic

Jump to



4x4Wire.com | OutdoorWire | MUIRNet News | 4x4Voice | 4x4Wire on FaceBook
About 4x4Wire | Advertiser's Guide |
This site and all original materials contained herein are Copyright 1999 - 2013 by OutdoorWire, Inc. -- All Rights Reserved.
The use of this website, OutdoorWire, or any of its publications or services is subject to the terms of use agreement.
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
This publication and OutdoorWire, Inc. assume no liability for your use of the material contained within this site.
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, SUVWire, JeepWire, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc.


Contact 4x4Wire | Privacy statement 4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Generated in 0.024 seconds in which 0.011 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.