DougB
Roll Me Over
Reged: 11/08/02
Posts: 4117
Loc: Terre Haute, IN
|
|
First off, my sincerest thanks for keeping this as close to the topic as possible.
Second...
Dexron III superceeds all Dexron's before it. My '89 manual calls for Dexron II, but there's no need to hunt for the stuff as any commonly available Dexron III will suffice. Just to point out, I have no idea what kind of ATF was used in my A/T before switching to Mobil 1 ATF. I previously had my A/T serviced by some "Jiffy" shop and a few Aamcos and I'm sure they probably used the cheapest Dexron III available. The stuff worked fine in my truck for years. Just to reiterate, I never had a transmission overheating issue before switching to Mobil 1 ATF.
Since switching to Mobil 1 ATF, the problem first manifested fairly early. From there, things have only gotten worse and not better (duh). From the time of the first post in this thread when I changed my filter and cleaned my pan AGAIN, it was only a short 600mi of travel before the A/T temp light kicked on again! ...and not the 10-12,000mi of travel I had previously enjoyed.
As far as price goes, I paid $6/qt for Mobil 1 ATF for quite awhile. Considering how much of the stuff I've gone through in the last 20mos, Mobil has made a hefty profit on my use of it. That will continue no longer.
I recently paid $5.24/qt for the Diamond SP III at the most expensive overpriced Mitsubishi dealership in the greater Chicago area. I've since learned that I can get the stuff for $3.66/qt at another dealer if I'm patient enough to wait.
Diamond SP III brand ATF, as far as I know, is what's best to use in your transmission as it's the dealer brand and it's what they'd put in your A/T if you had it serviced there. Results, however, are pending...
EDIT:
P.S. I know I've heard it rumored at some point in time that Toyota and Mits A/Ts must use a specific type of fluid. I'm guessing that rumor applies to all the Japanese brands that use Aisin/Aisin Warner transmissions. Can't remember where I may have heard/read that.
|
Winston
Rock Warrior
Reged: 02/01/05
Posts: 509
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
|
I just thought I would post this link to another forum, because they talk about using Chrysler ATF +4. There is also another guy that talks about using Mobil 1 with poor results in his 1999 Mitsu sport.
A/T fluid discussion.
-------------------- '90 Montero XLS (Sold, sadly)
'95 Montero LS 160k
'03 Montero Limited 30k
|
FrankR
Web Wheeler
Reged: 02/01/04
Posts: 9279
Loc: Columbia, SC
|
|
Doug -
I'm sure others will have conflicting opinions of Mobil 1 (and synthetics in general) but FWIW:
This morning I was in the heavy truck driveline shop that rebuilt my propshaft. They also build gear cases and differentials. I asked about Mobil 1 and was told by their shop manager - and all other workers nodded in agreement - that synthetics just don't lubricate as well in a gear case or differential as they do in an engine. The reason given to me was that engine clearances are .002-.003" whereas gear cases are ~.007". The synthetics are believed (by this group) to be too thin and don't cling as well - particularly when hot.
I can't prove or disprove their opinion, but thought you'd like to hear it. I can say they are very experienced and highly respected in their line of work and I learn something every time I chat with them.
Frank
-------------------- '89 G-Raider Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 155k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, 165A alt., Concorde AGM, Rust-Oleum, cobwebs
|
DougB
Roll Me Over
Reged: 11/08/02
Posts: 4117
Loc: Terre Haute, IN
|
|
Thanks Frank. Whatever the reason, it is clear that Mobil 1 ATF is not up to specs for use in the Aisin/Aisin Warner A/Ts and with the increased metal shavings I've been finding in my rr diff, I would suspect that it's not the correct lubricant to be using in ANY of the gearboxes.
I'm almost happy of the diagnosis. With as much as I like to check/change the fluid in my gearboxes, Switching back to "normal" lubricants will cost me less in the long run.
I'll try to look up this thread and give at least an anecdotal report or more in the future after getting in some mileage with the dino juices.
Good news is that the Mobil 1 10W-30 I use in the engine is keeping it purring nicely.
It's almost been a year now!
|
Kevin C
Trail Leader
Reged: 05/20/00
Posts: 5136
Loc: Portland OR, USA
|
|
Having run standard and synthetic lubes in differentials I have noted the following differences. The Redline was the only lube that prevented my LSD unit from chattering.
On a sports car I used to have after a long highway drive when I got onto surface streets the rear diff was very hot and the clutches grabbed like crazy. Draining the lube showed lots of metal on the magnet presumably from the clutches.
This problem was rcontinued with several different gear lubes and LSD additives including factory Mitsubishi LSD additive. I took the LSD unit apart dressed the clutch plates down and contemplated reducing the factory preload or putting new ones in. At $40 per plate and about eight of them that was not a good option. Cleaned up with fresh Vavoline non synthetic lube the problems continued.
On a whim (out of desperation) I tried Redline gear lube.
Problem gone.. Simple as that. Diff ran much cooler, minimal metal on the magnet after 10,000 miles of use, no noise. Synthetic lube in the gear box yielded good results as well. Finaly it shifted smoothly when cold.
As far as Dougs transmission goes it does seem he has a problem but the question is cause and effect. On a sample of one where there seems to be a correlation of lubricant choice to a possible wear issue and or over heating there is no way to know for sure that the oil is the problem. For all we know better film strength may have prevented an incipient failure from happening sooner.
On the other hand perhaps the lube is not all its supposed to be. If that the case is it fair to say all synthetics are bad? Not in my book. We might be able to say that one did not work.
Another point is the biggest difference in ATF formulations is the friction modifiers. This is what comes into play as the clutches are just starting to engage and the oil film is thinning. Electronic controlled transmissions that use feedback to modify their shifting are sensitive to this. Our older designs typically don’t really care.
That leaves film strength for bushing life. I cant imagine a bedded in set of bushings staring to fail on a lube change.
Overheating says slippage.
IF the slippage is a clutch pack the transmission would have been sintered long ago. They don’t slip for very long.
If it’s the converter there are scenerios I see for running hot on the highway.
Non lockup type unit:
1: the transmissions converter is a non lockup design and the loading of taller tires roof rack has exceeded what the design is capable of. The excess slippage generates more heat than the transmission can handle. This hurts fuel economy and lubricant life. Since the unit is running hard all the time wear rates are increased.
2: The cooling system of the transmission is faulty, perhaps combined with higher than normal loading.
The chance that the fluid has a significant influence on this is slim at best. A synthetic should thin less as it gets hot and help with converter coupling. There may be some small differnaces between lubes and perhaps an ATF that’s is used and thickened with age works better, however that does not change the root problem of the converter being overworked.
I had this problem myself when I put taller tires on my Turbo Raider. Getting a lockup converter or better gears are the best solutions.
Now if you already have a lockup converter and you are overheating on the highway odds are you have a bad convert clutch or its not being applied. Once the clutch locks the transmission runs very cool.
Finally look at what the factories are going to for gear lubes. My Passat comes factory filled with synthetic gear oil in the transaxle as do most new cars. These guys are not going to spend the extra money for no reason.
That’s my experience.
-------------------- 87 Raider, 2.6 Turbo-Intercooled, lockup auto tranny, 2.5" mandrel bent exhaust, 2.85 T case, LSD front diff, Torsen rear diff, V6 brakes and front axles, Dual suspension seats = lots of fun.
Edited by Kevin C (07/10/05 12:41 PM)
|
DougB
Roll Me Over
Reged: 11/08/02
Posts: 4117
Loc: Terre Haute, IN
|
|
Building on something that Kevin mentioned, there is another variable: overall vehicle height and weight.
I had two overheat conditions before ever lifting my truck and they were both in extreme wind conditions while carrying heavy loads. Overheating gradually began occuring more frequently after the the initial 1" body lift in Feb '04. I recently installed a 2" body lift in May and the overheating has become even more frequent.
Wind resistance is definately a prime suspect. We'll see what the fluid change does first, then deal with the wind resistance factor if necessary (larger ATF cooler).
|
FrankR
Web Wheeler
Reged: 02/01/04
Posts: 9279
Loc: Columbia, SC
|
|
You may be a candidate for a lockup torque converter. I'm keeping my eyes open for a complete '91 ebay special truck that I can use for the tranny and LSD.
Frank
-------------------- '89 G-Raider Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 155k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, 165A alt., Concorde AGM, Rust-Oleum, cobwebs
|
off-roader
Mitsubishi Forum Moderator
Reged: 01/16/00
Posts: 12265
Loc: Bay Area, CA
|
|
Quote:
... I'm keeping my eyes open for a complete '91 ebay special truck that I can use for the tranny and LSD.
Frank
I believe the 1990 also came with the Torque Converter.
-------------------- Off Roader
96 SR Auto, 89 V6 SWB Auto
96SR Build Up Thread
|
FrankR
Web Wheeler
Reged: 02/01/04
Posts: 9279
Loc: Columbia, SC
|
|
Quote:
I believe the 1990 also came with the Torque Converter.
Yes, but I'm not 100% sure that all '90s had it - early ones may not. I figured the '91-'94 is a sure thing but I can also get an LSD from the right '91.
Frank
-------------------- '89 G-Raider Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 155k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, 165A alt., Concorde AGM, Rust-Oleum, cobwebs
|
DougB
Roll Me Over
Reged: 11/08/02
Posts: 4117
Loc: Terre Haute, IN
|
|
I got around to replacing my A/T oil pan the other week so I didn't have to worry about that stripped out drain plug anymore. While I was in there, I replaced the filter yet again and flushed out all the Mobil 1 ATF with the Diamond ATF SP III stuff from the dealer. Worked okay for about 700mi, then the same results I'd been getting with the Mobil 1 ATF. 
This thing's running hot and there seems to be a direct correlation to the body lift. I pulled the front trim off the Raider tonight to prep it for a little grinding to increase the gape in the Raider's grin, hopefully providing more airflow over the A/T cooler. While I was in there, I got a good look at the cooler itself before the sun set. Doesn't look good. Most of the cooling fins are bent over, so I'm sure that's adding to the problem as well. Looked into buying a new cooler... $400!!! 
Anyone have a spare? Oh well, time to hit the junkyards.
|