Please update your Flash Player to view content.

4x4Wire is for you, your 4x4 and access issues that interest four-wheelers
You, your 4x4, access issues, places to go and more outdoor topics

Ongoing discussion of recreational and environmental issues for four-wheelers
Ongoing discussion of recreation and environmental issues affecting California

Environmental news and information for recreation advocates
Environmental news and information for recreation advocates

Discussion forums covering a variety of 4x4 model technical issues and general recreation topics
Discussion forums covering 4x4 technical issues and general recreation topics


Search 4x4Wire for more on OHV recreation and 4x4 Tech

Recreation Advocate

The OutdoorWire family websites feature news and information affecting outdoor recreation opportunities and access to public lands. 

Fifteen current and former Arizona Game and Fish commissioners urge president to say no on monument designation

(Jan. 22, 2016) PHOENIX – The five-member Arizona Game and Fish Commission and 10 former commissioners have sent a letter to President Barack Obama, urging that he not designate 1.7 million acres in northern Arizona as a new Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument.

Calling the proposed monument “a solution to a non-existing problem,” the commissioners said designating this large swath of land as a national monument could impose unnecessary rules and regulations, negatively impact outdoor recreation, and compromise the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s ability to manage and conserve the public's wildlife.


The commissioners support the multiple-use concept on public land, as that approach provides the most wildlife-related recreational opportunities for the public and allows the commission and department to work closely with the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on sustainable resource management.

“That partnership is not broken, and we do not believe another layer of bureaucracy is needed to conserve or ‘protect’ 1.7 million more acres on the Arizona Strip or Kaibab National Forest,” the commissioners said in the letter.

The commissioners countered several claims by monument proponents, pointing out that:

  • There is no threat to the migration corridor for deer between Arizona and Utah. If an issue were to arise, we should seek to remedy and mitigate it, not create another set of rules.
  • Selected harvest and forest management is a viable management tool and shouldn’t be eliminated. Catastrophic wildfires over the last decade demonstrate the importance of regulated forest management.
  • The area is already protected from uranium mining under a moratorium until 2032, at which time there may be new, environmentally safer technologies that would allow for cleaner extraction.
  • Travel management plans in the national forests have already closed many roads. The public shouldn’t be denied reasonable access to their public lands from additional road closures a monument designation might bring.
  • Ranchers who are good stewards of both the land and wildlife could be forced out by monument restrictions. Game and Fish works with many ranchers and private landowners who take wildlife needs into consideration.   

Finally, the letter pointed out that Arizona already has more national monuments (18) than any other state, and that only 23 percent of the remaining federally owned public land in the state does not have some sort of special designation.

The commissioners concluded that the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and Department can ensure that Arizona’s wildlife is properly managed and conserved by working cooperatively with the Forest Service and the BLM, and they urged the President not to burden Arizona with this unwarranted national monument designation.

Invasive mussels found in Arizona lake
Thread cleaning made easy

Related Posts

 

Comments

John Stewart on Monday, 25 January 2016 16:00

As an update....

KNAU, Arizona Public Radio
A recent poll showed a majority of Arizonans support the possible designation of a national monument outside Grand Canyon National Park. But a group of current and former state wildlife officials have voiced their opposition to the idea. Arizona Public Radio’s Ryan Heinsius reports.
Fifteen current and former members of the Arizona Game and Fish Commission recently sent a letter to President Obama. They urged him not to use his executive authority to create the 1.7-million-acre national monument on the North and South rims of the Grand Canyon. The commissioners say such a designation would impose unnecessary regulation, compromise wildlife management, and negatively affect outdoor recreation.
Conservation groups, regional tribes and some members of Congress, however, have backed a potential Grand Canyon Heritage National Monument. They say it would protect the canyon’s watershed by placing a ban on area uranium mining, and preserve old-growth forest on the Kaibab Plateau.
Colorado College’s annual Conservation in the West Poll showed nearly three-quarters of Arizonans supported a national monument near the Grand Canyon. It also showed almost 85 percent of the state’s residents felt the Colorado River was at risk.
http://knau.org/post/poll-shows-support-grand-canyon-monument-amid-opposition-az-game-and-fish#stream/0

To me, this displays a lack of understanding about the lands around the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon National Park is already in existence. To the north extending into Utah is the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. There are also tribal reservations in the area. And, the National Park shares a western boundary with the Lake Meade National Recreation Area. The poll respondents appear to have no clue as to the existing protections and land ownership....

0
As an update.... KNAU, Arizona Public Radio A recent poll showed a majority of Arizonans support the possible designation of a national monument outside Grand Canyon National Park. But a group of current and former state wildlife officials have voiced their opposition to the idea. Arizona Public Radio’s Ryan Heinsius reports. Fifteen current and former members of the Arizona Game and Fish Commission recently sent a letter to President Obama. They urged him not to use his executive authority to create the 1.7-million-acre national monument on the North and South rims of the Grand Canyon. The commissioners say such a designation would impose unnecessary regulation, compromise wildlife management, and negatively affect outdoor recreation. Conservation groups, regional tribes and some members of Congress, however, have backed a potential Grand Canyon Heritage National Monument. They say it would protect the canyon’s watershed by placing a ban on area uranium mining, and preserve old-growth forest on the Kaibab Plateau. Colorado College’s annual Conservation in the West Poll showed nearly three-quarters of Arizonans supported a national monument near the Grand Canyon. It also showed almost 85 percent of the state’s residents felt the Colorado River was at risk. http://knau.org/post/poll-shows-support-grand-canyon-monument-amid-opposition-az-game-and-fish#stream/0 To me, this displays a lack of understanding about the lands around the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon National Park is already in existence. To the north extending into Utah is the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. There are also tribal reservations in the area. And, the National Park shares a western boundary with the Lake Meade National Recreation Area. The poll respondents appear to have no clue as to the existing protections and land ownership....

4x4Wire Posts List

OutdoorWire Websites

OutdoorWire

OutdoorWire

Portal page for OutdoorWire Access and Landuse Central Read More
4x4Voice

4x4Voice

California OHV recreation news and information Read More
MUIRNet News

MUIRNet News

News and information about outdoor recreation Read More
4x4Wire

4x4Wire

Off road recreation and news and information Read More
TrailTalk 
Forums

TrailTalk Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums for 4x4 tech information Read More
  • 1