Much is said today about the changing lifestyle that allows more freedom for leisure time activities, more time for recreation. During leisure time, people have the freedom to engage in a variety of activities and outdoor recreation is popular. Some recreationists are informed and experienced; others are uninformed and inexperienced.
The term "uninformed recreationist" refers to the one that is gung-ho go anywhere at anytime without a care in the world for what is happening. Someone that has the attitude that they "own" the land and their “rights” come first, above all else.
An "enlightened recreationist" realizes the land and its resources are the wealth of the nation and belong to the people of the nation. They accept that it is not about going anywhere at anytime without a care in the world. Their “rights” co-exist with the “rights” of others.
Search 4x4Wire for more on OHV recreation and 4x4 Tech
The "enlightened recreationist" realizes that routes are the key to access and resources are the reason for access. Routes were constructed to access the forests to harvest the trees for the lumber to build homes. Routes were constructed to mines where minerals and ores are extracted to provide raw materials to manufacture the goods used in our daily lives. Routes were constructed to access lands used for grazing of livestock that helps feed the people.
There was a period in the late 1800s that was a low point in caring for the land and resources. Logging, mining and grazing practices of that era are not a shining example of efficiency or responsibility. There was plenty of waste. Extraction was king. Preservation was not an issue. Conservation was not an issue. Recreation was not a part of the equation. Profit was the primary concern.
As the years past, times changed. Preservation and conservation pressures increased. Logging, mining and grazing on public lands gave way to preservation of public lands. Recreation pressures increased. People changed their views about public lands. The routes still provide access to the natural resources for a shared purpose.
The original goal of maintaining public lands for the public has changed from generating wealth, building homes, and providing food to providing camping, picnics, and a host of leisure time activities.
Recreation is growing. Extraction of resources from the lands is on the decline. Using public land for the good of the public (generating and sustaining wealth) is looked on as the “evil incarnate”. Routes constructed for support of extraction are key to recreation. Those routes are a bane to preservation.
The use of public lands for extraction, preservation, and recreation form a triangle. One point of the triangle is extraction (logging, mining, grazing). Another point of the triangle is preservation (wilderness and national parks). The third point is recreation.
For aesthetics and symmetry, the triangle needs the balance of equal sides and angles. Preservation is fighting both recreation and extraction for control. Recreation is fighting preservation AND extraction.
There are a few “enlightened recreationists” that realize the importance of extraction. The U.S. Congress established laws that govern the extraction industries. Under those laws, routes were constructed to support mining, logging, and grazing. The routes recreation depends on exist because of mining, logging, and grazing. The loss of mining, logging, and grazing, removes the legal basis for the routes. Extraction needs the routes for access. Preservation wants the routes closed. Recreation wants the routes for access. Rival interests are in conflict.
In the beginning was extraction. Preservation began to correct the abuses of extraction. Preservation is in conflict with growing demand for recreation. Preservation is placing the wealth of the public lands out of reach - off limits to extraction and to recreation.
The crux of the problem is extraction, preservation and recreation working for the same goal; access. The issue is ACCESS and the goal is conservation. Conservation to provide for sustainable extraction of raw materials for economic needs. Conservation to provide for social needs of the public. Conservation to provide for the preservation of natural wonders. Extraction, preservation and recreation are of equal importance. It would be unwise for recreation or extraction or preservation to be the sole or dominant policy at the expense of the conservation.
The bell is tolling for extraction and recreation. The “enlightened recreationists” understand the link between extraction and recreation. Preservation is at odds with extraction and recreation. Preservation wants more lands for wilderness. Extraction and recreation want more access to public lands. The triangle is out of balance.
Change is needed. Recreation is growing. Options for recreational access to public lands are decreasing. Changes to laws governing wilderness and endangered species are needed; changes that support a balanced conservation goal. There are no quick and easy answers. It is going to take time, effort and pain. It is about balance.