Please update your Flash Player to view content.

4x4Wire is for you, your 4x4 and access issues that interest four-wheelers
You, your 4x4, access issues, places to go and more outdoor topics

Ongoing discussion of recreational and environmental issues for four-wheelers
Ongoing discussion of recreation and environmental issues affecting California

Environmental news and information for recreation advocates
Environmental news and information for recreation advocates

Discussion forums covering a variety of 4x4 model technical issues and general recreation topics
Discussion forums covering 4x4 technical issues and general recreation topics


Search 4x4Wire for more on OHV recreation and 4x4 Tech

4x4Wire Discussions

4x4Wire Discussions features news and information about OHV recreation and environment issues. (Site registration required to post)
  1. John Stewart
  2. On the 'Wire
  3. Wednesday, March 06 2013, 08:01 AM
  4.  Subscribe via email

The long running legal case involving a short section of road in northern Nevada is coming to an end - and the road will remain open.  This case has covered a range of legal issues including RS-2477, water rights, wilderness, and endangered species.  In the end, the local county has prevailed and the road will be re-constructed.





This case arose out of the long and contentious process to repair a flood-damaged road in a sensitive area of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. Great Old Broads appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Forest Service on Great Old Broads' claims related to the Forest Service's record of decision (ROD) determining the method of restoring the South Canyon Road as part of the Jarbridge Canyon Project. The court held that Great Old Broads exhausted its claims before the Forest Service but that the ROD conformed to the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), 16 U.S.C. 1600-1687, Executive Order 11988, and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f. The court reversed the district court on its analysis of exhaustion, but affirmed the district court on its alternative decision on the merits as to each of the claims presented.Court Description:Environmental Law. The panel reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States Forest Service in an action challenging the Forest Service’s approval of the restoration of a flood-damaged road in the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in Nevada. The panel reversed the district court’s holding on exhaustion, and held that each of the claims presented on appeal were adequately exhausted by plaintiff’s submissions to the Forest Service. The panel affirmed the district court’s alternative holding on the merits, granting summary judgment in favor of the Forest Service. The panel held that the Forest Service’s Record of Decision conformed to the National Forest Management Act, Executive Order 11988, and the National Environmental Policy Act.


A copy of the court decision is attached:

Attachments (1)

John Stewart Managing Editor - 4x4Voice - 4x4Wire - MUIRNet.net Natural Resources Consultant - California Four Wheel Drive Association - http://www.cal4wheel.com Board of Directors - BlueRibbon Coalition http://www.sharetrails.org

Comment
There are no comments made yet.


There are no replies made for this post yet.
However, you are not allowed to reply to this post.

4x4Wire Posts List

OutdoorWire Websites

OutdoorWire

OutdoorWire

Portal page for OutdoorWire Access and Landuse Central Read More
4x4Voice

4x4Voice

California OHV recreation news and information Read More
MUIRNet News

MUIRNet News

News and information about outdoor recreation Read More
4x4Wire

4x4Wire

Off road recreation and news and information Read More
TrailTalk 
Forums

TrailTalk Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums for 4x4 tech information Read More
  • 1